Enhancement effect of urea toward electroporation-mediated plasmid transfection efficiency in the HEK-293 cell line

Mahshid Mowla , Gilar Gorji-Bahri, Hamid Reza Moghimi , Atieh Hashemi

Abstract


Background and purpose:Intracellular delivery is crucial in biological and medical studies. Although many molecular tools have been created for cell-based gene therapies, it remains challenging to introduce external molecules into cells. As one of the most popular non-viral transfection methods, electroporation induces transient pores in the cell membrane by applying an external electric field. Unsatisfactory transfection efficiency and low cell viability are the major drawbacks of electroporation. To overcome these issues, the current study investigated the effect of urea on electroporation-mediated transfection efficiency.

Experimental approach: Three voltages of electroporation, including 100, 120, and 140 V, and 3 concentrations of urea buffer, including 0.25%, 0.5%, and 1% W/V, were considered as variables in this study. The HEK-293 cell line was used for transfection, and green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression was evaluated using flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy.

Findings/Results: The results showed that the combination of electroporation and urea increased electroporation efficacy, but the effect depended on voltage and urea concentration. When different concentrations of urea were added to HEK-293 cells at a voltage of 100 V, the number of cells transfected by pEGFP-N1 increased (from 12.3 ± 0.2% in untreated cells to 17.35 ± 0.55%, 23.3 ± 0.3%, and 14 ± 0.1% at urea concentrations of 0.25%, 0.5%, and 1% W/V, respectively). The electroporation buffer containing 0.5% W/V urea showed the highest EGFP expression (23.3 ± 0.3%) and high cell viability (over 90%).

Conclusion and implications: This research offers a new perspective for improving gene transfection efficiency once electroporation is utilized.

 

 


Keywords


Chemical enhancers; Electroporation; Gene delivery; HEK-293 cells; Mammalian cells; Urea.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kim TK, Eberwine JH. Mammalian cell transfection: the present and the future. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;397(8):3173-3178.DOI: 10.1007/s00216-010-3821-6.

Rahimmanesh I, Totonchi M, Khanahmad H. The challenging nature of primary T lymphocytes for transfection: effect of protamine sulfate on the transfection efficiency of chemical transfection reagents. Res Pharm Sci. 2020;15(5):437-446.DOI: 10.4103/1735-5362.297846.

Lambricht L, Lopes A, Kos S, Sersa G, Préat V, Vandermeulen G. Clinical potential of electroporation for gene therapy and DNA vaccine delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2016;13(2): 295-310.DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2016.1121990.

Rezaei N, Dormiani K, Ghaedi K, Khazaie Y, Lachinani L, Foruzanfar M, et al. Construction and efficiency evaluation of replicating nonviral minicircle for gene therapy. Res Pharm Sci. 2012;7(5):S425.

Alsaggar M, Liu D. Physical methods for gene transfer. Adv Genet. 2015;89:1-24.DOI: 10.1016/bs.adgen.2014.10.001.

Zhang Z, Qiu S, Zhang X, Chen W. Optimized DNA electroporation for primary human T cell engineering. BMC Biotechnol. 2018;18(1):1-9.DOI: 10.1186/s12896-018-0419-0.

Igawa K, Ohara N, Kawakubo A, Sugimoto K, Yanagiguchi K, Ikeda T, et al. D-glucosamine promotes transfection efficiency during electroporation. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014:1-4.DOI: 10.1155/2014/485867.

Tokudome Y, Sugibayashi K. The synergic effects of various electrolytes and electroporation on the in vitro skin permeation of calcein. J Control Release. 2003;92(1-2):93-101.DOI: 10.1016/S0168-3659(03)00307-9.

Sen A, Zhao Y, Zhang L, Hui SW. Enhanced transdermal transport by electroporation using anionic lipids. J Control Release. 2002;82(2-3): 399-405.DOI: 10.1016/S0168-3659(02)00164-5.

Saffari M, Tamaddon AM, Hoseini Shirazi F, Oghabian MA, Moghimi HR. Improving cellular uptake and in vivo tumor suppression efficacy of liposomal oligonucleotides by urea as a chemical penetration enhancer. J Gene Med. 2013; 15(1):12-19.DOI: 10.1002/jgm.2688.

Goodman BE. Transport of small molecules across cell membranes: water channels and urea transporters. Adv Physiol Educ. 2002;26(1-4): 146-157.DOI: 10.1152/advan.00027.2002.

Barton KN, Buhr MM, Ballantyne JS. Effects of urea and trimethylamine N-oxide on fluidity of liposomes and membranes of an elasmobranch. Am J Physiol. 1999;276(2):R397-R406.DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1999.276.2.R397.

Mukerjee P, Ray A. The effect of urea on micelle formation and hydrophobic bonding. J Phys Chem. 1963;67(1):190-192.DOI: 10.1021/j100795a046.

Yancey PH, Somero GN. Counteraction of urea destabilization of protein structure by methylamine osmoregulatory compounds of elasmobranch fishes. Biochem J. 1979;183(2):317-323.DOI: 10.1042/bj1830317.

Alamuru-Yellapragada NP, Kapadia B, Parsa KVL. In-house made nucleofection buffer for efficient and cost effective transfection of RAW 264.7 macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;487(2):247-254.DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.04.043.

Chicaybam L, Barcelos C, Peixoto B, Carneiro M, Limia CG, Redondo P, et al. An efficient electroporation protocol for the genetic modification of mammalian cells. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2017;4:99,1-13.DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2016.00099.

Iversen N, Birkenes B, Torsdalen K, Djurovic S. Electroporation by nucleofector is the best nonviral transfection technique in human endothelial and smooth muscle cells. Genet Vaccines Ther. 2005;3(1):2,1-13.DOI: 10.1186/1479-0556-3-2.

Chicaybam L, Sodre AL, Curzio BA, Bonamino MH. An efficient low cost method for gene transfer to T lymphocytes. PloS One. 2013;8(3):e60298, 1-11.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060298.

Zu Y, Huang S, Liao WC, Lu Y, Wang S. Gold nanoparticles enhanced electroporation for mammalian cell transfection. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2014;10(6):982-992.DOI: 10.1166/jbn.2014.1797.

Hyder I, Eghbalsaied S, Kues WA. Systematic optimization of square-wave electroporation conditions for bovine primary fibroblasts. BMC Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(1):9,1-8.DOI: 10.1186/s12860-020-00254-5.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.